Are you expecting all the dust to reach the same height as the astronaut's boot?
What is the basic physics that you claim the dust must follow?
You appear relatively sane-minded to me. Refreshing.
The main video I focused on was A16, Duke's side-jump, close to the camera - because it's CLOSE UP, so provides the best resolution.
Here is the KRITA frame analysis in MP4 format:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JRjdohQ0cXftl_feaVeMT1rdYSlkS7mS/view?usp=drive_linkI've RETRACTED my claim of this being "good evidence" due to ambiguities... I personally still "see it", but can understand if others don't, and since I can't trace the trajectory of individual particles, but am only dealing with "clouds of dust" partially obscured by the shadows behind it - I've simply withdrawn this claim as "good evidence for MLH".
One thing to note, if you are interested is frame 13 -- we see thick dust at about the same height as his RIGHT FOOT (the left foot he is KICKING UP... so rises higher than Duke's center-of-mass).
This dust that rises as high as his right foot, QUICKLY falls to the ground, which would indicate "higher than lunar gravity" as in this scene, the MLH theory is that Duke is being partially lifted by thin top cable, to make him feel much lighter, and thus falls much slower (2x slower).
Thus if this is on earth, the dust will fall 2x faster... which is "what I see"... and simply realize this isn't a good place to "fight a battle" as there is simply too much room for bias/ambiguities.
Notice that by frame 18, the dust from under his left foot is COMPLETELY GONE, while his right foot is still far from reaching the ground.
No need to argue this further if you don't see it. That's fine.
Unlike some other people here (who never took physics at all), they cannot accept that not everyone agrees or sees the same stuff -- especially when things are so cloudy (pun intended).